2008 Primaries, Views on News • April 17th, 2008
The ABCs of the Dem debate
by Chris Lato
Wow, is ABC being raked over the coals for its handling of Wednesday’s debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. I can’t say it’s unjustified.
For starters, the questions coming from Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos were, for a good stretch of time, pretty idiotic. At one point, I left the room and my wife yelled at me to come back to the TV to get a load of the latest stupid question being posed. And we were far from alone in this reaction: TV critic/analyst Tom Shales has a great column that breaks down just how much of a wasted opportunity this debate really was.
Still others were fired up over ABC’s bizarre decision to have Stephanopoulos co-anchor the debate. After all, he was a top dog in the Bill Clinton White House. Seems kinda biased, no?
This is an interesting question and I have some personal experience on this one. As a former reporter who later worked for the Wisconsin Republican Party, then returned to reporting for a time in 2007 as an anchor/reporter for WTMJ-AM in Milwaukee, I took some heat from those who asked how I could be unbiased after working for the evil GOP. I did stay unbiased (I received not a single complaint about perceived bias during my nine months on-air). I have no doubt Stephanopoulos is sensitive to this charge too.
Still, co-hosting a debate in which one of the participants was a confidante and the wife of your former boss is a little different. And, indeed, ABC is accused of being pro-Clinton on this debate. That is the risk they took by putting Stephanopoulos in charge.
Obama is obviously paying attention and reaping the benefits, using the generally sour debate reaction to his advantage.
Poor Hillary just can’t land a punch on this guy. We’ll see if the poll numbers in Pennsylvania hold up, or if this whole thing will all be over a bit before the convention.
Recent Comments:
- blatham: Uh…Cristi is part of a covert RNC operation, in the mode of Limbaugh’s “chaos...
- Publius: Lest we forget the Jodie Montgomery ad by the Doyle campaign in 2006 that accused Mark Green of...
- Isabel: Who cares what Cusack thinks and saids. Why do entertainment people think they can rule the hearts and minds...
- Adam Young: Those three minutes spoke volumes and spoke the truth about how some people really feel. What you are...
- Chris Lato: Thanks for the heads up on the battle your candidate is involved in. I know and like Mark Honadel. I...
Browse by Topic
- 2008 Primaries (67)
- Branding Politix (31)
- Creative (17)
- Events (6)
- Fundraising (6)
- Global Concerns (2)
- Grass Roots Organization (12)
- Leadership (24)
- Messaging (50)
- Promotions (3)
- public relations (36)
- Q & A (2)
- Report from the Field (3)
- Research & Ideas (2)
- Speeches (9)
- Strategic Blueprints (16)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Views on News (69)
- wispundits (19)
Learning Center
Recent Headlines
- Children of the corn
- The case of the reappearing pin
- And the best candidate for vice-president is…
- The best use of resources…?
- Surveying the landscape
- Shameless self-promotion…and another take on Twitter
- Politicians tweet to future voters
- The Christian candidate?
- Picking up the pieces
- Forget Mortgages: Where’s The Student Loan Bailout?
- Feingold still hearts McCain
- Flood water, and questions, linger
- MoveOn sounds off
- The long goodbye
- “Aldi” it takes is 3 minutes or less … to damage reputation
Monthly Archives
Browse by Tag
-
2008
Barack Obama
Barrett
Bill Clinton
branding
Butler
Campaign
CBS
Clinton
CNN
communications
debate
Democrat
Democrats
Doyle
election
elections
Fundraising
Gableman
GOP
Hillary Clinton
Huckabee
Iraq
John McCain
Journal Sentinel
McCain
Messaging
Milwaukee
Milwaukee County
Mitt Romney
New York Times
Obama
Packers
politics
President Bush
public relations
Republican
Republicans
scandal
Scott Walker
Supreme Court
vice president
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Public Radio
YouTube
Blogroll
Talk Back
Loading ...
Leave a Reply